现在的位置: 首页时讯速递, 进展交流>正文
[Lancet Infect Dis发表论文]:β-内酰胺类过敏标记的负担
2025年09月27日 时讯速递, 进展交流 [Lancet Infect Dis发表论文]:β-内酰胺类过敏标记的负担已关闭评论

The burden of β-lactam allergy labels in health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Mengyuan Fu, Lin Hu, Kexin Han, et al

Lancet Infect Dis 2025; 25: 896-908

Summary

Background

Unverified β-lactam allergy labels (BALs) pose a considerable barrier to optimal antimicrobial treatment and represent a growing public health concern. However, no comprehensive meta-analysis has been conducted to explore the associations between BALs and clinical outcomes. We aimed to evaluate existing evidence on the clinical outcomes associated with BALs to determine their global burden.

Methods

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase from Jan 1, 2000, to Nov 30, 2024. We included observational and interventional studies that compared clinical outcomes related to the presence or absence of a BAL (as reported or documented in any clinical record), irrespective of patient age or clinical setting. The outcomes assessed included the incidence of surgical site infections, the incidence of infections or colonisation due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) or Clostridioides difficile, mortality, and length of hospital stay. Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models, with subgroup analyses conducted by region, country income level, type of BAL, hospital setting, sample size, age group, and quality of evidence. Publication bias was assessed using Begg's funnel plots and Egger's regression test. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023484030).

Findings

63 studies were included in this systematic review, of which 60 (95%) were from high-income countries. Studies were done in the Americas (41 [65%]), Europe (15 [24%]), and the Western Pacific region (seven [11%]). Seven studies were of moderate quality and none were classified as low quality. No significant publication bias was detected for most outcomes, except for length of hospital stay (p=0·0062). Overall, BALs were associated with increased rates of surgical site infection (OR 1·60, 95% CI 1·27–2·01; p<0·0001; I2=70·3%), rates of infection or colonisation with both MDROs (1·42, 1·22–1·64; p<0·0001; I2=84·4%) and C difficile (1·26, 1·16–1·37; p<0·0001; I2=56·4%), and length of hospital stay (standardised mean difference 0·06 days, 95% CI 0·05–0·08; p<0·0001; I2=86·1%). BALs were also associated with death at or after 180 days but not with overall, in-hospital, or 30-day mortality.

Table. Characteristics of the included studies

Empty CellStudies (n=63)
Country income level
High income60 (95%)
Upper-middle income3 (5%)
Region of study
Region of the Americas41 (65%)
European region15 (24%)
Western Pacific region7 (11%)
Research population
Children4 (6%)
Adults35 (56%)
No distinction24 (38%)
Sample size
<100016 (25%)
1000–999921 (33%)
≥10 00026 (41%)
Data source
National or regional databases15 (24%)
Hospital electronic medical record48 (76%)
Quality assessment*
High quality56 (89%)
Moderate quality7 (11%)
Hospital setting
Outpatient3 (5%)
Inpatient52 (82%)
Emergency3 (5%)
Multiple settings5 (8%)
Type of β-lactam allergy label
Unspecified22 (35%)
Penicillin allergy label41 (65%)
*Quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale tool for cohort and case–control studies and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality scale for cross-sectional studies.

Interpretation

BALs are associated with an array of adverse health outcomes, especially surgical site infection and infection or colonisation with MDROs and C difficile. Although BALs were associated with longer hospital stays, the observed difference was unlikely to be clinically relevant. The heterogeneity and methodological limitations of the included studies could limit the robustness of some of our conclusions. However, these findings underscore the need to develop and evaluate public health initiatives to curb inaccurate allergy labelling, thereby reducing unnecessary avoidance of first-line β-lactam antibiotics.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China.

抱歉!评论已关闭.

×
腾讯微博