现在的位置: 首页时讯速递, 进展交流>正文
[JAMA Netw Open]: 口服万古霉素预防难辨梭状芽孢杆菌感染复发
2025年09月22日 时讯速递, 进展交流 [JAMA Netw Open]: 口服万古霉素预防难辨梭状芽孢杆菌感染复发已关闭评论

Original Investigation 

Infectious Diseases

Oral Vancomycin for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Julie A. Keating, Tinghui Xu, Mary Beth Graham, et al

JAMA Netw Open 2025;8;(7):e2517834. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17834

Key Points

Question  Is oral vancomycin prophylaxis effective for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) during antibiotic treatment for non-CDI indications?

Findings  In this randomized clinical trial of 81 participants who had completed treatment for a CDI and were taking systemic antibiotics for a non-CDI indication, recurrent CDI occurred in 43.6% of participants in the oral vancomycin group vs 57.1% in the placebo group at 8 weeks. However, the study was underpowered and this difference did not reach statistical significance.

Meaning  Other interventions should be investigated for their effectiveness in preventing CDI recurrence after non–CDI-indicated antibiotic therapy.

Abstract

Importance  Systemic antibiotic use for patients with a non–Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a major risk factor for recurrent CDI. Increasing use of oral vancomycin for secondary prophylaxis against recurrent CDI in this context has uncertain efficacy.

Objective  To evaluate whether oral vancomycin prophylaxis compared with placebo is effective against recurrent CDI during and 8 weeks after the end of study treatment.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This phase 2, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted in 4 large health systems across the upper Midwest US. Adults who had completed treatment for CDI within the past 180 days and were taking a systemic antibiotic for a non-CDI indication were enrolled between May 21, 2018, and March 30, 2023, and followed up for 8 weeks after the end of study treatment.

Intervention  Participants were randomized 1:1 to 125 mg of oral vancomycin or placebo once daily during antibiotic use for a non-CDI plus 5 days following cessation of those antibiotics.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was recurrent CDI incidence during treatment and the 8-week follow-up period. The secondary outcome was vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus carriage in stool.

Results  Among 81 randomized participants (median age, 59 years [IQR, 50-67 years]), all were included in the primary as-randomized analysis (39 in the vancomycin group; 42 in the placebo group). Sixty patients (74.1%) completed 8-week follow-up and were included in the secondary as–completed treatment analysis (31 in the vancomycin group; 29 in the placebo group). Recurrent CDI occurred in 17 of 39 participants in the oral vancomycin group (43.6%) and 24 of 42 in the placebo group (57.1%; absolute difference in percentage, −13.5% [95% CI, −35.1% to 8.0%]). Adverse events occurred in 27 of 39 participants in the oral vancomycin group (69.2%) and 27 of 42 in the placebo group (64.3%). Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus carriage was found in 15 of 30 patients in the oral vancomycin group (50.0%) and 6 of 25 in the placebo group (24.0%) (P = .048) 8 weeks after treatment.

Conclusions and Relevance  In this randomized clinical trial, the incidence of recurrent CDI was lower (though did not reach significance) in participants taking oral vancomycin compared with those taking placebo. Because the study was underpowered, it was unable to reveal firm conclusions about the efficacy (or lack thereof) of vancomycin prophylaxis with respect to recurrent CDI.

Trial Registration  ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03462459

抱歉!评论已关闭.

×
腾讯微博