现在的位置: 首页时讯速递, 进展交流>正文
[Chest发表论文]:高流量鼻导管氧疗流量设置对拔管结局的影响
2025年07月18日 时讯速递, 进展交流 [Chest发表论文]:高流量鼻导管氧疗流量设置对拔管结局的影响已关闭评论

CRITICAL CARE: ORIGINAL RESEARCHVolume 167, Issue 5P1388-1396 May 2025

Effect of Flow Rates of High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Extubation Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Sheng-Yuan Ruan, Yao-Wen Kuo, Chun-Ta Huang, et al

Chest 2025; 167: 1388-1396

Abstract

Background

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has emerged as a promising intervention for postextubation oxygen therapy, with the potential to reduce the need for reintubation. However, it remains unclear whether using a higher flow setting provides better outcomes than the commonly used flow rate of 30 to 50 L/min.

Research Question

Does setting the flow rate of HFNC at 60 L/min vs 40 L/min for postextubation care result in different extubation outcomes?

Study Design and Methods

This randomized controlled trial assigned intubated patients to receive HFNC at either a 60 L/min or 40 L/min flow rate following extubation. The assigned flow rate was maintained for 24 hours. The primary outcome was a composite of reintubation or the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) within 48 hours’ after extubation. Key secondary outcomes included ahead-of-schedule changes in HFNC settings and mortality.

Results

A total of 180 patients were randomized; 169 were included in the analysis (86 in the 40 L/min group and 83 in the 60 L/min group). The primary outcome events occurred in 19 patients (22.1%) in the 40 L/min group and in 14 patients (16.9%) in the 60 L/min group (risk difference, 5.2%; 95% CI, –6.7% to 17.1%; P = .39). For secondary outcomes, the 40 L/min group was associated with a higher risk of escalation in respiratory support, defined as using NIV or up-titration of HFNC settings (24 [27.9%] vs 8 [9.6%]; P = .002).

Interpretation

In unselected extubated patients, setting the HFNC flow rate at 60 L/min did not reduce the risk of reintubation or NIV use compared with a flow rate of 40 L/min. Using a flow rate of 40 L/min with as-needed up-titration may be a reasonable alternative to setting the flow at 60 L/min for postextubation care. However, this trial may not have been sufficiently powered to exclude a small between-group difference.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04934163; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

抱歉!评论已关闭.

×
腾讯微博