现在的位置: 首页时讯速递, 进展交流>正文
[JAMA发表论文]:血压对4种降压药物反应的异质性
2023年05月15日 时讯速递, 进展交流 [JAMA发表论文]:血压对4种降压药物反应的异质性已关闭评论

Original Investigation 

April 11, 2023

Heterogeneity in Blood Pressure Response to 4 Antihypertensive Drugs: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Johan Sundström, Lars Lind, Shamim Nowrouzi, et al

JAMA. 2023;329(14):1160-1169. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.3322

Key Points

Question  Is there a potential for personalized drug therapy in hypertension, and, if so, what is the magnitude of the benefit of personalization?

Findings  In this randomized, double-blind, repeated crossover trial, the blood pressure response to treatments varied substantially between individuals. It was estimated that personalized treatment choice would on average lead to 4.4 mm Hg–lower systolic blood pressure than a fixed choice.

Meaning  There is heterogeneity in blood pressure response to drug therapy for hypertension, of a magnitude that warrants further research.

Abstract

Importance  Hypertension is the leading risk factor for premature death worldwide. Multiple blood pressure–lowering therapies are available but the potential for maximizing benefit by personalized targeting of drug classes is unknown.

Objective  To investigate and quantify the potential for targeting specific drugs to specific individuals to maximize blood pressure effects.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A randomized, double-blind, repeated crossover trial in men and women with grade 1 hypertension at low risk for cardiovascular events at an outpatient research clinic in Sweden. Mixed-effects models were used to assess the extent to which individuals responded better to one treatment than another and to estimate the additional blood pressure lowering achievable by personalized treatment.

Interventions  Each participant was scheduled for treatment in random order with 4 different classes of blood pressure–lowering drugs (lisinopril [angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor], candesartan [angiotensin-receptor blocker], hydrochlorothiazide [thiazide], and amlodipine [calcium channel blocker]), with repeated treatments for 2 classes.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Ambulatory daytime systolic blood pressure, measured at the end of each treatment period.

Results  There were 1468 completed treatment periods (median length, 56 days) recorded in 270 of the 280 randomized participants (54% men; mean age, 64 years). The blood pressure response to different treatments varied considerably between individuals (P < .001), specifically for the choices of lisinopril vs hydrochlorothiazide, lisinopril vs amlodipine, candesartan vs hydrochlorothiazide, and candesartan vs amlodipine. Large differences were excluded for the choices of lisinopril vs candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide vs amlodipine. On average, personalized treatment had the potential to provide an additional 4.4 mm Hg–lower systolic blood pressure.

Conclusions and Relevance  These data reveal substantial heterogeneity in blood pressure response to drug therapy for hypertension, findings that may have implications for personalized therapy.

Trial Registration  ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02774460

抱歉!评论已关闭.

×
腾讯微博