现在的位置: 首页时讯速递, 进展交流>正文
[Intensive Care Med发表论文]:休克患者微循环的直接评估
2023年08月09日 时讯速递, 进展交流 [Intensive Care Med发表论文]:休克患者微循环的直接评估已关闭评论

Direct assessment of microcirculation in shock: a randomized-controlled multicenter study

Raphael Romano Bruno, Jakob Wollborn, Karl Fengler, et al

Intensive Care Medicine volume 49, pages 645–655 (2023)

Abstract

Purpose

Shock is a life-threatening condition characterized by substantial alterations in the microcirculation. This study tests the hypothesis that considering sublingual microcirculatory perfusion variables in the therapeutic management reduces 30-day mortality in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with shock.

Methods

This randomized, prospective clinical multicenter trial-recruited patients with an arterial lactate value above two mmol/L, requiring vasopressors despite adequate fluid resuscitation, regardless of the cause of shock. All patients received sequential sublingual measurements using a sidestream-dark field (SDF) video microscope at admission to the intensive care unit (± 4 h) and 24 (± 4) hours later that was performed blindly to the treatment team. Patients were randomized to usual routine or to integrating sublingual microcirculatory perfusion variables in the therapy plan. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality, secondary endpoints were length of stay on the ICU and the hospital, and 6-months mortality.

Results

Overall, we included 141 patients with cardiogenic (n = 77), post cardiac surgery (n = 27), or septic shock (n = 22). 69 patients were randomized to the intervention and 72 to routine care. No serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred. In the interventional group, significantly more patients received an adjustment (increase or decrease) in vasoactive drugs or fluids (66.7% vs. 41.8%, p = 0.009) within the next hour. Microcirculatory values 24 h after admission and 30-day mortality did not differ [crude: 32 (47.1%) patients versus 25 (34.7%), relative risk (RR) 1.39 (0.91–1.97); Cox-regression: hazard ratio (HR) 1.54 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90–2.66, p = 0.118)].

Conclusion

Integrating sublingual microcirculatory perfusion variables in the therapy plan resulted in treatment changes that do not improve survival at all.

抱歉!评论已关闭.

×
腾讯微博