现在的位置: 首页时讯速递, 进展交流>正文
[Chest发表论文]:疑似感染的急诊科患者抗生素使用时机与进展为感染性休克
2022年02月11日 时讯速递, 进展交流 暂无评论

CRITICAL CARE: ORIGINAL RESEARCH| VOLUME 161, ISSUE 1, P112-120, JANUARY 01, 2022

Antibiotic Timing and Progression to Septic Shock Among Patients in the ED With Suspected Infection

Roshan Bisarya, Xing Song, John Salle, et al

Chest 2022; 161: 112-120

Background

Recent medical society opinions have questioned the use of early antimicrobials in patients with sepsis, but without septic shock.

Research Question

Is time from ED presentation to administration of antibiotics associated with progression to septic shock among patients with suspected infection?

Study Design and Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study from March 2007 through March 2020. All adults with suspected infection and first antimicrobial administered within 24 h of triage were included. Patients with shock on presentation were excluded. We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses predicting progression to septic shock.

Results

Seventy-four thousand one hundred fourteen patient encounters were included in the study. Five thousand five hundred ten patients (7.4%) progressed to septic shock. Of the patients who progressed to septic shock, 88% had received antimicrobials within the first 5 h from triage. In the multivariate logistic model, time (in hours) to first antimicrobial administration showed an OR of 1.03 (95% CI, 1.02-1.04; P < .001) for progression to septic shock and 1.02 (95% CI, 0.99-1.04; P = .121) for in-hospital mortality. When adjusted for severity of illness, each hour delayed until initial antimicrobial administration was associated with a 4.0% increase in progression to septic shock for every 1 h up to 24 h from triage. Patients with positive quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) results were given antibiotics at an earlier time point than patients with positive systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score (0.82 h vs 1.2 h; P < .05). However, median time to septic shock was significantly shorter (P < .05) for patients with positive qSOFA results at triage (11.2 h) compared with patients with positive SIRS score at triage (26 h).

Interpretation

Delays in first antimicrobial administration in patients with suspected infection are associated with rapid increases in likelihood of progression to septic shock. Additionally, qSOFA score has higher specificity than SIRS score for predicting septic shock, but is associated with a worse outcome, even when patients receive early antibiotics.

给我留言

您必须 [ 登录 ] 才能发表留言!

×
腾讯微博