Critical Care: Original Research

Low-Intensity vs Moderate-Intensity Anticoagulation for Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: The Strategies for Anticoagulation During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Pilot Trial

Whitney D. Gannon, Elias H. Pratt, Melissa A. Vogelsong, et al

Chest 2025; 168: 639-649

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.032

Background

Bleeding is a common and sometimes fatal complication of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Whether lowering the intensity of anticoagulation during venovenous ECMO is safe or effective is unknown.

Research Question

Is a large, multicenter randomized trial of low-intensity vs moderate-intensity anticoagulation during venovenous ECMO feasible?

Study Design and Methods

In a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized pilot trial conducted at 3 centers across the United States, we randomly assigned critically ill adults undergoing venovenous ECMO to low-intensity or moderate-intensity anticoagulation. Feasibility was assessed by enrollment rate and adherence to the assigned anticoagulation strategy. The primary efficacy outcome was major bleeding, and the primary safety outcome was thromboembolic events, both assessed between enrollment and 24 hours after decannulation.

Results

All of the 26 patients enrolled received the assigned intensity of anticoagulation. A major bleeding event occurred in 1 of 12 patients (8.3%) in the low-intensity anticoagulation group and in 4 of 14 patients (28.6%) in the moderate-intensity anticoagulation group (absolute risk difference, –20.2 percentage points; 95% CI, –48.6 to 8.1; P = .33). One patient experienced a thromboembolic event (8.3%) in the low-intensity anticoagulation group compared with none in the moderate-intensity group (difference, 8.3 percentage points; 95% CI, –7.3 to 24.0; P = .46). No patients died before discharge in the low-intensity anticoagulation group, compared with 2 patients (14.3%) in the moderate-intensity group, both of whom experienced major bleeding events. No patients died before discharge in the low-intensity anticoagulation group, compared with 2 patients (14.3%) in the moderate-intensity group, both of whom experienced major bleeding events.

Interpretation

Our results indicate that enrollment and separation between groups are feasible in a multicenter randomized trial of low-intensity vs moderate-intensity anticoagulation for critically ill adults receiving venovenous ECMO. A large, multicenter, randomized trial is needed and seems to be feasible.

Clinical Trial Registry

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04997265; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov