现在的位置: 首页时讯速递, 进展交流>正文
[Lancet Infect Dis发表读者来信]:80岁以上老年人接种三针辉瑞新冠病毒mRNA疫苗后体液免疫及T细胞免疫的动态改变
2022年06月11日 时讯速递, 进展交流 暂无评论

CORRESPONDENCE| VOLUME 22, ISSUE 5, P588-589, MAY 01, 2022

Dynamics of humoral and T-cell immunity after three BNT162b2 vaccinations in adults older than 80 years

Addi J Romero-Olmedo, Axel Ronald Schulz, Svenja Hochstätter, et al

Lancet Infect Dis 2022; 22: 588-589

A third mRNA-based booster vaccination is the currently favoured strategy to maintain protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Yet, significant waning of specific immunity within 6 months after two doses,1 along with a higher incidence of breakthrough infections associated with the time elapsed since the second dose,23 raise concerns regarding the durability of immunity also after the booster vaccination.We compared the specific humoral and cellular responses (figureappendix pp 10–13) after three versus two BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) doses in a cohort of adults older than 80 years (median age 83 years [IQR 81–86]; appendix pp 3–4) at risk for severe COVID-19 and immune senescence. Our data demonstrate the induction of marginally higher spike S1-specific blood IgG concentrations 2 weeks after three than after two doses (appendix p 5). By contrast, functionally relevant receptor binding domain-specific IgG (figure A) and SARS-CoV-2-neutralising antibody (appendix p 5) titres were substantially increased after three compared with two doses, reflecting enhanced antibody production or affinity maturation.

FigureHumoral and cellular SARS-CoV-2 immunity in donors older than 80 years after two and three doses of BNT162b2
Immune response kinetics were followed in older adults in the course of vaccinations with BNT162b2 (second vaccination occurred 3 weeks and third vaccination occurred a median of 24 weeks [IQR 23–25] after first vaccination). Green indicates data related to the third dose of BNT162b2. Each symbol represents data of one donor at one timepoint. Horizontal lines indicate median values of datapoints in each column. p values were determined by two-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. (A) SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific serum IgG levels; for weeks 5, 24, 26, and 40, number of participants was 35, 36, 34, and 15, respectively. The dotted horizontal line indicates the cutoff for antibody positivity at 7·1 BAU/mL. (B) Frequencies of SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific CD4 T cells identified as CD40 ligand-positive, interferon γ-positive CD4 T cells after overnight stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides; for weeks 5, 24, 26, and 40, number of participants was 34, 35, 33, and 13, respectively. RBD=receptor-binding domain. BAU=binding antibody units.

By contrast, spike-specific CD4 T-cell frequencies reached similar levels after two and three doses (figure Bappendix p 5). After the respective acute response, frequencies returned to approximately pre-third vaccination levels, with no significant differences in the rate of decline after the second and third vaccinations (figure Bappendix p 6). Quantified cytoplasmic expression of the effector cytokine interferon γ (IFNγ) indicated functional enhancement of spike-specific T cells upon second but not further upon third vaccination, while more cytoplasmic IFNγ was found in spike-specific CD4 T cells from adults older than 80 years who had recovered from COVID-19 (appendix p 5). Thus, even a third BNT162b2 dose failed to induce durably enhanced quantities of spike-specific T cells and a functional quality reached after natural infection. Neither age nor comorbidities were significantly correlated with the observed immune response, perhaps due to the limited size of our cohort (appendix pp 7–9).Concentrations of S1-specific IgG and neutralising antibodies also declined from the acute responses at weeks 5 and weeks 26, but at a lower rate and with an extended half-life after the third (week 40) compared with the second (week 24) dose (figure Aappendix pp 5–6), yielding more persistent, enhanced IgG quantity or quality after the third than after the second vaccination.We conclude that a third dose of BNT162b2 in older adults, while establishing immunity in primary non-responders,4 induces a durably escalated humoral response in the bulk of vaccinees for at least 3 months, indicating longer lasting humoral immunity. In a younger cohort, this boost also led to a strong increase of neutralising antibodies against the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant and protection from infection with the omicron variant.56 Although neutralising antibody data for omicron are not yet available for our cohort, the strong rise in titres of neutralising antibodies against the BavPat1/2020 isolate used in our neutralisation assay (appendix p 5) suggests better neutralisation against omicron by the booster dose than for the second dose, as also demonstrated by others,7 at least in the short term. The level of T-cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in peripheral blood required for protection is still not established, although peripheral T cells induced by BNT162b2 apparently react well against the omicron variant.8 As for our cohort, our data show two important aspects of a third compared with a second dose—namely, peak virus-specific T-cell frequencies were not further increased by a third dose, and average per-cell production of IFNγ remained unaltered and was still remarkably lower than in recovered donors of a similar age. Thus, at least in older adults, the durability and quality of vaccine-induced immunity should be considered in the recommendation of booster vaccinations, in addition to the severity of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections caused by current and future viral mutants.

给我留言

您必须 [ 登录 ] 才能发表留言!

×
腾讯微博