{"id":29873,"date":"2026-01-01T04:19:00","date_gmt":"2025-12-31T20:19:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/?p=29873"},"modified":"2026-01-01T06:12:20","modified_gmt":"2025-12-31T22:12:20","slug":"bmj%e5%9c%a3%e8%af%9e%e4%b8%93%e5%88%8a%ef%bc%9a%e5%b8%ae%e5%8a%a9%e4%bd%a0%e8%b6%85%e8%b6%8adoug-altman%e6%80%bb%e5%85%b11060928%e6%ac%a1%e5%bc%95%e7%94%a8%e7%9a%84%e6%96%b0%e5%b9%b4%e8%a7%a3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/?p=29873","title":{"rendered":"[BMJ\u5723\u8bde\u4e13\u520a]\uff1a\u5e2e\u52a9\u4f60\u8d85\u8d8aDoug Altman\u603b\u51711060928\u6b21\u5f15\u7528\u7684\u65b0\u5e74\u89e3\u51b3\u529e\u6cd5"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Feature<\/strong>&nbsp;Christmas 2025: Citation Millionaire<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"page-title\">New Year\u2019s resolutions to push you past Doug Altman\u2019s 1\u2009060\u2009928 citations<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Jonathan J Deeks, Gary S Collins<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><em>BMJ<\/em>\u00a02025;\u00a0391\u00a0doi:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.r2550\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.r2550<\/a>\u00a0(Published 17 December 2025)Cite this as:\u00a0<em>BMJ<\/em>\u00a02025;391:r2550\u00a0<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-1\">Is your aim to become a famous researcher with over 1\u2009000\u2009000 citations against your publications? Do you need help thinking of New Year\u2019s resolutions to reach this target? Then this article is for you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-2\">Alongside French philosopher Michel Foucault<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-1\">1<\/a>&nbsp;and Canadian computer scientist Yoshua Bengio,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-2\">2<\/a>&nbsp;Doug Altman is one of three academics with over 1\u2009000\u2009000 citations recorded on Google Scholar,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-3\">3<\/a>&nbsp;a milestone he achieved in April 2025. An internationally acclaimed statistician, Doug was&nbsp;<em>The BMJ<\/em>\u2019s chief statistical adviser for over 20 years, and he conceived and led global initiatives to raise the standards for medical research.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-4\">4<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-3\">How was this landmark achieved? Drawing inspiration from Doug\u2019s remarkable career, our collective 26 years of working with him, insights from the unfinished biography that he kindly left with one of us (GSC), and correspondence with his wife, Sue, we have characterised his philosophy as \u201cten tips for citation success\u201d (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#boxed-text-1\">box 1<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Box 1<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Ten tips for citation success<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul id=\"list-1\">\n<li>1 Make time for writing<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>2 Enjoy reading and words<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>3 Write something you are passionate about<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>4 Write things people need to know about<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>5 Approach writing as an art<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>6 Choose your words wisely<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>7 Keep your words and sentences as simple as possible, as complex as necessary<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>8 Share drafts and get feedback from coauthors early<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>9 Be a collaborator that everybody wants to work with<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>10 Write papers that could become citation magnets<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-14\">We recognise the irony of celebrating citations for a man who said, \u201cAll that citation index stuff is complete bollocks, of course.\u201d<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-5\">5<\/a>&nbsp;Citations are incomplete, easily manipulated, and a function of career length. High citation counts are meaningful only in the context of doing good science, and setting a high citation target will not by itself make you a better scientist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-15\">Yet, these numbers reflect an undeniable truth: Doug Altman shaped how medical research is conducted and reported. You may never reach 1\u2009000\u2009000 citations, but if you write with passion, collaborate generously, treat writing as an art, and produce work that is genuinely useful, you will maximise the impact of your work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-16\">So, if your goal is genuine influence that results in citations, here is our take on the Altman blueprint.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">1 Make time for writing<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-17\">You need volume and consistency. Clearly, quantity does not equate to quality, and volume is not necessarily a target but a consequence of longevity as a researcher. The last time Doug updated his publication list (5 April 2017), he had 998 publications (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#F1\">fig 1<\/a>); he was first author on 285.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/F1.large_-3.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1024\" height=\"422\" src=\"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/F1.large_-3-1024x422.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-29874\" srcset=\"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/F1.large_-3-1024x422.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/F1.large_-3-300x124.jpg 300w, https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/F1.large_-3-768x316.jpg 768w, https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/F1.large_-3.jpg 1428w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>But how did he do so much? His wife, Sue, says that he worked most of the time that he was awake, not something we would necessarily encourage. His first publication is not on Google Scholar\u2014aged 15, he published a letter in the match programme of his beloved Arsenal FC, the editor clearly spotting a potential future statistician (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#F2\">fig 2<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#F3\">fig 3<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/F2.large_-4.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"475\" height=\"665\" src=\"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/F2.large_-4.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-29875\" srcset=\"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/F2.large_-4.jpg 475w, https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/F2.large_-4-214x300.jpg 214w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 475px) 100vw, 475px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/F3.large_-1.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"746\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/F3.large_-1-746x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-29876\" srcset=\"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/F3.large_-1-746x1024.jpg 746w, https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/F3.large_-1-218x300.jpg 218w, https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/F3.large_-1-768x1054.jpg 768w, https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/F3.large_-1-1119x1536.jpg 1119w, https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/F3.large_-1.jpg 1276w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 746px) 100vw, 746px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-22\">Writing thrives on routine. Block out dedicated time in your schedule. Protect it fiercely and avoid meetings in those periods. Some of this time will be spent staring at a blank screen, waiting for inspiration. That\u2019s part of the process. Papers don\u2019t write themselves; unless you consistently carve out time to work on them, they simply won\u2019t get written.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2 Enjoy reading and words<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-23\">Doug showed that becoming a skilled writer begins with being a fervent reader. His career began when mainframe computers required patience while waiting for code to run. He used this time to read, working with fellow statisticians to dissect flaws in published articles. Journal clubs are a great way to force yourself to read, learn to critically appraise research, and enjoy discussion. Communicating complex scientific ideas clearly is challenging, but reading a wide range of material exposes you to different writing styles, showing which approaches work and which do not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">3 Write something you are passionate about<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-24\">Doug wrote because he cared. His frustration about the poor quality of statistics in journal articles fuelled his passion. He turned that anger into a lecture, and then into his first commissioned series of eight papers in&nbsp;<em>The BMJ<\/em>, under the title \u201cStatistics and ethics in medical research.\u201d<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-6\">6<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-7\">7<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-8\">8<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-9\">9<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-10\">10<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-11\">11<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-12\">12<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-13\">13<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-25\">The unethical misuse of statistics underlined his deeply held belief in the importance of scientific integrity. He said, \u201cTo maximise the benefit to society, you need to not just do research but do it well,\u201d<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-4\">4<\/a>&nbsp;and \u201cWhat should we think about researchers who use the wrong techniques, use the right techniques wrongly, misinterpret their results, report their results selectively, cite the literature selectively, and draw unjustified conclusions? We should be appalled.\u201d<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-14\">14<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-26\">Being passionate often makes the writing process easier and more enjoyable, as ideas will typically flow more naturally. Readers can tell when the author has a genuine passion for the subject matter; it makes the paper and the message more compelling and persuasive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">4 Write things people need to know about<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-27\">Doug knew that complaining about bad research wasn\u2019t enough; he had to provide the solution, realising that researchers need instruction. By filling a void, he created work that was used, reused, and cited. His publications on reporting guidelines are his most influential work. He was instrumental behind initiatives like the CONSORT statement\u2014\u201cReaders should not have to infer what was probably done; they should be told explicitly.\u201d<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-15\">15<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-28\">Doug didn\u2019t stop with leading the CONSORT statement.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-16\">16<\/a>&nbsp;He proposed an extensive \u201cexplanation and elaboration\u201d document to accompany it.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-17\">17<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-18\">18<\/a>&nbsp;This approach is now standard, published alongside many reporting guideline papers, including PRISMA,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-19\">19<\/a>&nbsp;STARD,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-20\">20<\/a>&nbsp;STROBE,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-21\">21<\/a>&nbsp;REMARK,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-22\">22<\/a>&nbsp;SPIRIT,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-23\">23<\/a>&nbsp;and TRIPOD.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-24\">24<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-29\">Not everyone will write a CONSORT<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-16\">16<\/a>&nbsp;or PRISMA<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-25\">25<\/a>&nbsp;statement. But, when writing your paper, consider what the reader needs to know and what key messages you want to convey, and then present them clearly. Use boxes, tables, and figures strategically to highlight and reinforce your message.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">5 Approach writing as an art<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-30\">Doug talked about writing as a form of sculpture, where authors and editors revisit the text repeatedly, starting with a large chisel, then using increasingly finer tools.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-26\">26<\/a>&nbsp;He particularly liked crafting short sentences\u2014and was amused by single word titles,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-27\">27<\/a>&nbsp;a couple of which he managed to publish.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-28\">28<\/a>&nbsp;He was alert to potentially ambiguous wording, often turning sentences around to improve their sense or make them shorter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">6 Choose your words wisely<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-31\">Careful word choice is fundamental to effective scientific writing. The language you use not only conveys data and findings but also shapes how those ideas are interpreted, critiqued, and built on. Aim for precision in terminology to communicate concepts accurately and avoid ambiguity or misinterpretation. Keep your writing clear and concise so that complex arguments remain accessible to readers outside the immediate field. Be especially vigilant with statistical terms, which are often misused.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-29\">29<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-32\">Choose phrasing that reinforces credibility. Overly casual or imprecise language can weaken the perceived rigour of your work. Remember that scientific publications often serve as enduring references, so the words you choose may influence discourse for years. By writing simply and clearly, you can strengthen the impact of your work and contribute meaningfully to the advancement of knowledge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">7 Keep your words and sentences as simple as possible, as complex as necessary<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-33\">The goal of scientific writing is to engage and be transparent, allowing readers to see the science clearly without stumbling over words, spin, or misdirection. Use simple language, removing barriers to understanding, and reserve complexity for defining precise concepts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-34\">Doug\u2019s style, especially in his method papers, was engaging. He often started with a question and wrote in the first and second person. He made the reader part of the conversation, which made his explanations easier to follow. Consider his very first 1977 methods paper, for example: \u201cIt is possible that I have given the impression that statistical principles are difficult to grasp or dangerous to use. This would be unfortunate. Used with care, statistical techniques provide a very powerful means of advancing the cause of rational and constructive medicine. Statistical methods provide rules for asking the right questions and producing reliable answers.\u201d<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-30\">30<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">8 Share drafts early<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-35\">Good papers are team efforts, and Doug exemplified this. He never lent his name to a manuscript. He read and edited every draft. His feedback could take time, but it was always insightful and improved the work. Make your coauthors do some work and give them deadlines. Coauthorship is not an automatic right; it is a status that must be earnt. As the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors guidelines note, authorship is based on \u201cdrafting the work or reviewing it critically for important intellectual content\u201d (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.icmje.org\/\">www.icmje.org<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-36\">Circulate drafts early to encourage feedback, allowing your coauthors to refine arguments, identify gaps, and strengthen the overall clarity of the work before ideas become fixed. Early sharing also fosters a sense of shared ownership and accountability, ensuring that all voices are integrated into the paper rather than added as afterthoughts. By incorporating diverse perspectives from the outset, the quality and rigour of the manuscript are enhanced, producing a stronger, more cohesive, and influential publication.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">9 Be a collaborator that everybody wants to work with<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-37\">Research thrives on trust, respect, and clear communication, so being a collaborator that everyone wants to work with is vital. Doug published with over 1600 coauthors from many countries.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-4\">4<\/a>&nbsp;When people see you as constructive, reliable, and supportive, collaborations become more productive. The final work gains credibility and, hopefully, impact.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">10 Write papers that become \u201ccitation magnets\u201d<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-38\">Citation magnets are papers that have longevity and utility. Clinical studies can age quickly; methods papers endure. Doug\u2019s book\u00a0<em>Practical Statistics for Medical Research<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-31\">31<\/a>\u00a0and the Bland-Altman method<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-32\">32<\/a>\u00a0(the most cited paper in the\u00a0<em>Lancet<\/em>) are timeless resources. Reporting guidelines rank among some of the most cited publications in the literature. Doug was instrumental in developing many of these, including CONSORT,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-16\">16<\/a>\u00a0PRISMA,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-30\">30<\/a>\u00a0SPIRIT,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-23\">23<\/a>\u00a0STARD,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-20\">20<\/a>\u00a0STROBE,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-21\">21<\/a>\u00a0and TRIPOD.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#ref-33\">33<\/a>\u00a0Because journals mandate their use, authors cite them to indicate compliance. Doug has 13 citation magnets with over 10\u2009000 citations (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/391\/bmj.r2550#T1\">table 1<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Table 1<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-39\">Doug\u2019s citation magnets (papers with &gt;10\u2009000 citations)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>Publication<\/th><th>Citations<br \/>(as of 16\/12\/25)<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Moher D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.&nbsp;<em>BMJ<\/em>&nbsp;2009;339:b253525<\/td><td>190\u2009119*<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Von Elm E, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.&nbsp;<em>BMJ<\/em>2007;339:b270034<\/td><td>69\u2009460*<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Higgins JPT, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.&nbsp;<em>BMJ<\/em>&nbsp;2003;327:557-6035<\/td><td>61\u2009835<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.&nbsp;<em>Lancet<\/em>&nbsp;1986;327:307-1032<\/td><td>58\u2009967<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Liberati A, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.&nbsp;<em>BMJ<\/em>&nbsp;2009;339:b270019<\/td><td>58\u2009182*<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Higgins JPT, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration\u2019s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.&nbsp;<em>BMJ<\/em>&nbsp;2011;343:d592836<\/td><td>35\u2009772<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall\/CRC, 199131<\/td><td>27\u2009390<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Sterne JAC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.&nbsp;<em>BMJ<\/em>&nbsp;2016;355:i491937<\/td><td>18\u2009021<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Whiting PF, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.&nbsp;<em>Annals of Internal Medicine<\/em>&nbsp;2011;155:529-3638<\/td><td>14\u2009409<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Vandenbroucke JP, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.&nbsp;<em>International Journal of Surgery<\/em>2014;12:1500-2421<\/td><td>13\u2009310*<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.&nbsp;<em>Statistical Methods in Medical Research<\/em>&nbsp;1999;8:135-6039<\/td><td>11\u2009125<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Collins GS, et al. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ 2015;102:148-5840<\/td><td>10\u2009933*<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Moher D, et al. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials.&nbsp;<em>Lancet<\/em>&nbsp;2001; 357: 1191-119416<\/td><td>10\u2009417*<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">*\u00a0Collective citations owing to simultaneous publication in multiple journals<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"p-41\">Writing a citation magnet will typically depend on covering the right topic at the right moment, as well as including an element of luck. Nevertheless, by following these tips, you can lay a strong foundation that increases the likelihood of producing a paper that attracts substantial attention.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Feature&nbsp;Christmas 2025: Citation Millionaire New Y [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[32,23],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29873"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=29873"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29873\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29877,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29873\/revisions\/29877"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=29873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=29873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=29873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}