{"id":28362,"date":"2025-07-15T04:26:00","date_gmt":"2025-07-14T20:26:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/?p=28362"},"modified":"2025-07-15T05:50:44","modified_gmt":"2025-07-14T21:50:44","slug":"jama-netw-open%e5%8f%91%e8%a1%a8%e8%ae%ba%e6%96%87%ef%bc%9a%e7%be%8e%e5%9b%bd%e5%90%84%e5%b7%9e%e5%be%81%e7%a8%8e%e6%94%bf%e7%ad%96%e3%80%81%e8%82%bf%e7%98%a4%e7%ad%9b%e6%9f%a5%e4%b8%8e%e7%97%85","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/?p=28362","title":{"rendered":"[JAMA Netw Open\u53d1\u8868\u8bba\u6587]\uff1a\u7f8e\u56fd\u5404\u5dde\u5f81\u7a0e\u653f\u7b56\u3001\u80bf\u7624\u7b5b\u67e5\u4e0e\u75c5\u6b7b\u7387"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Original Investigation&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Health Policy<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>May&nbsp;2,&nbsp;2025<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\">State-Level Tax Policy, Cancer Screening, and Mortality Rates in the US<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Odysseas P.&nbsp;Chatzipanagiotou,&nbsp;Mujtaba&nbsp;Khalil,&nbsp;Usama&nbsp;Waqar,&nbsp;et al<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><em>JAMA Netw Open.&nbsp;<\/em>2025;8(5):e258455. doi:10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2025.8455<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><a><\/a>Key Points<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Question<\/strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;Are state-level tax revenue and tax progressivity associated with cancer screening and cancer mortality rates in the US?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Findings<\/strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;This cross-sectional study of 1150 state-years consisting of tax revenue data for 23 years (1997-2019) and 50 states found that increased tax income was associated with increased cancer screening rates, as well as decreased cancer mortality rates; this association was more prominent among White than racial and ethnic minority populations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Meaning<\/strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;These findings suggest that state-level tax revenue may serve as one aspect of a multifaceted approach to improve cancer-related outcomes in the US and help bridge cancer care gaps, particularly in more progressive tax policy settings.<a><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Abstract<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Importance<\/strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;The Healthy People 2030 initiative has set national cancer screening targets for breast, colon, and cervical cancers, as well as aims for reducing cancer mortality. State-level tax policy is an underappreciated social determinant of health that may improve cancer screening and mortality rates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Objective<\/strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;To define the association of tax revenue and tax progressivity with state-level cancer screening and mortality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Design, Setting, and Participants<\/strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;This ecologic, population-based, cross-sectional study assessed cancer screening (2020 and 2022) and mortality rates (1999-2021) in the US relative to state-level tax revenue (1997-2019) and tax progressivity (2002, 2009, 2012, 2014, and 2018) with a 2-year lag. The study included 50 states through 23 years with state-years used as the unit of analysis. Cancer screening rates were derived from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Population Level Analysis and Community Estimates database. State-level cancer-related death and population counts were derived from the CDC Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database. Data analysis occurred from September to January 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Exposure<\/strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;State-level tax policy was proxied by tax revenue per capita and the Suits index of tax progressivity, with progressive taxation equaling lower tax burden for more disadvantaged populations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Main Outcomes and Measures<\/strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;Outcomes included screening rates for colon, breast, and cervical cancer, as well as mortality rates for all malignant neoplasms and malignant neoplasms with guideline-recommended screening. Multivariable models were adjusted for tax-related, socioeconomic, and demographic variables.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Results<\/strong>\u00a0\u00a0In total, 1150 state-years were included in the analysis. Median (IQR) tax revenue per capita was $4432 ($3862-$5210), and the median (IQR) number of cancer-related deaths was 8341 (3150-13\u202f585) across all state-years. Of note, each $1000 increase in tax revenue per capita was associated with a 1.61% (95% CI, 0.50%-2.73%) increase in colorectal cancer screening, 2.17% (95% CI, 1.39%-2.96%) increase in breast cancer screening, and 0.72% (95% CI, 0.34%-1.10%) increase in cervical cancer screening rate. For malignant neoplasms with guideline-recommended screening, each $1000 increase in tax revenue per capita was associated with a decreased cancer mortality rate among White (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.95, 95% CI, 0.93-0.98), but not racial and ethnic minority (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.99, 95% CI, 0.97-1.02) populations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn.jamanetwork.com\/ama\/content_public\/journal\/jamanetworkopen\/939603\/zoi250307f1_1745525891.74702.png?Expires=1753798907&amp;Signature=dRnr-rB1SUhHwPI5BZdOtHyJvEfTqmghxqMBKZTMLykfllVU8sWX8WqYOgc~54LJNdIfafh3pYcpI7b2yo3Sd2-tcYnUzU5avkfxDPNCiI3-VXXTVFSJDCsyKdTbkpFaaXsc4K5kEAWANIR1EYbExkNMvkaVk81YK1z2Z1QJqOGgxRErrcu72UKa5q8p-nKppf0YRgbNN5tNyTfJjMGkCWWV3ZYhq5I~L2~PyMX8StIyMC5uY~tn6DDLB3LCuGtoiEeQUWQ9~DCpxoIze79kHZsXl5gaajxW9K9u-oI1x6nmAuuvYl9GhmbS7e2H2-F1BjKX4SN9o3IlLdI9PdLOLg__&amp;Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA\" alt=\"\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn.jamanetwork.com\/ama\/content_public\/journal\/jamanetworkopen\/939603\/zoi250307t1_1745525891.83702.png?Expires=1753798907&amp;Signature=wJis~KKj6PMDIQC93E9ydVxgCTHs0J0Koy-ZSbyBzQBUCNBXJmUNeag7aazoK3PcYj4eR2alr9fJh8QbIgawrgtPySH-JOKNYh4vm8-661RNyjmD0VrkeZ1Ya55hbZVtxZnc2RVPypU2~8S7-LT2cBJ9uPnJsaAl2tYqdHGgHN7FPLN3Bf-NhxMjNcNz7g-UNLhZYl55bfwdK-ExwUh8BioeMoxLfXPm2MKX0lK0oanE7BoWIRcwQBzswlGI6HieI72shfHofpzei~pNq5NVvWbegT8~3N5YBHpoxPv2pDEx7v54J3kpjcLydt19eUkFh3BTDa4CoNj9o8hGxYr2Nw__&amp;Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA\" alt=\"\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn.jamanetwork.com\/ama\/content_public\/journal\/jamanetworkopen\/939603\/zoi250307t2_1745525891.91202.png?Expires=1753798907&amp;Signature=H2csbWBjTk80L4h9ne0Cjw8jr1M5SBEz~ACeKe9vQ7V-Ej9dLRXCk~CssoeU3Iy5Iop5f14~XYH5bUDDmErBtkji36LLghQzNRbw-PBW~dHdw4BJu3jiZmiquGQXuBbao9KBt0mpUxOFwqSyN0ykgecZ6kqQvmeHglPMrac-qUAx6JzPkqiFkqyLVht3WKnxh5ZTv10CmO827yLoicuUMaG9km8bpvG~wIFuv3mxqtmBKGPJQn2S3FddHoLw8oFUyoCv0qQFkpe-80MBGG6hD1YXsvcA2P2j24bQA48fn~kAeUi9KvPXnYDzp1zcrG6ECJIk8wjxYTuixAmB6ZM2cA__&amp;Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA\" alt=\"\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn.jamanetwork.com\/ama\/content_public\/journal\/jamanetworkopen\/939603\/zoi250307t3_1745525891.94202.png?Expires=1753798907&amp;Signature=lINyX1Kcw5-AzblQGRb0jugjwCJ~TL-tT~udjkvMCS4H9-uUtf5~HVYtnNLrJfI8JXFyxf1BXqiuD4F5-6ctjcjUX3okv9GzlUYPWXu1gbv3HtszrpkNqPGAUu7LNUCDDci5MFCfwDb2G7AdnKG6ooiOMn4935Wh9DDZSnhvquyt4TLJmainAMJ748lI8~n-VueK7hgL5ZcOKohPMHm1-8RKn~Gab17SoqNvWAEo1sgdyWhZphOFxPmRXMvtswUtalpCJN~a1Pc1ENWFV2iKWtUkQfNHuFd0hxz4VqNwHGrseArBxxZwKSjAdPrvBVncnfX-9RcWm4Gupm4Ss3LnLQ__&amp;Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA\" alt=\"\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn.jamanetwork.com\/ama\/content_public\/journal\/jamanetworkopen\/939603\/zoi250307t4_1745525891.95202.png?Expires=1753798907&amp;Signature=KPZ1u3uMTmwOIvDpjAlDcp19wMZo0h-WE80pMChhQTCQ7Y7q3C-gieKEPA6HVM4ubCmgQhB0GjzjSFQZOVvbwBMk5c7h09s3HCs0ea3WwPfA6c1XkBL2KcqTKlrK8Sf7myQciUQozVkBKfX6xm0T8zrg~cii-Jnx0k-ucP~8Dq5~b2s~5LF2VAhDrLBSjmuf~maxSR8qlj4tiHTcFskC~hMLHhfM3yQ8XJTUmnapD6EXSK~X0Be9YcNFJc4HKLg3lvGEduDHJREzjDV6tfZQWjZi6mCq~D3OTCxjxFJgmk9LJAmrPGJTtTeYaEwdXAQSJ4AlRaKPTb6UeryVNLk5hg__&amp;Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA\" alt=\"\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Conclusions and Relevance<\/strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;In this cross-sectional study, tax policy was associated with increased state-level cancer screening rates, as well as decreased cancer mortality rates, which mostly benefited White populations, suggesting that state-level policies may contribute to bridging ongoing cancer care gaps.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Original Investigation&nbsp; Health Policy May&nbsp;2,&#038; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[32,23],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28362"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=28362"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28362\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28705,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28362\/revisions\/28705"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=28362"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=28362"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=28362"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}