{"id":26447,"date":"2024-09-20T04:11:00","date_gmt":"2024-09-19T20:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/?p=26447"},"modified":"2024-09-20T08:35:18","modified_gmt":"2024-09-20T00:35:18","slug":"jama-netw-open%e5%8f%91%e8%a1%a8%e8%ae%ba%e6%96%87%ef%bc%9a%e4%b8%8d%e5%90%8c%e8%8d%af%e7%89%a9%e9%97%b4%e7%9b%b8%e4%ba%92%e4%bd%9c%e7%94%a8%e5%ae%a1%e6%a0%b8%e7%a8%8b%e5%ba%8f%e5%af%b9%e4%ba%8e","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/?p=26447","title":{"rendered":"[JAMA Netw Open\u53d1\u8868\u8bba\u6587]\uff1a\u4e0d\u540c\u836f\u7269\u95f4\u76f8\u4e92\u4f5c\u7528\u5ba1\u6838\u7a0b\u5e8f\u5bf9\u4e8e\u8d28\u5b50\u6cf5\u6291\u5236\u5242\u7684\u4e00\u81f4\u6027"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Original Investigation <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology<\/p>\n\n\n\n

July 9, 2024<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Agreement of Different Drug-Drug Interaction Checkers for Proton Pump Inhibitors<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Massimo Carollo, Salvatore Crisafulli, Margherita Selleri, et al<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

JAMA Netw Open. <\/em>2024;7(7):e2419851. doi:10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2024.19851<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

<\/a>Key Points<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Question<\/strong>  What is the level of agreement between the summary of product characteristics (SPCs) and interaction checkers (ICs) in providing information concerning drug-drug interactions (DDIs) related to proton pump inhibitors?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Findings<\/strong>  In this cross-sectional study of the SPCs for 5 proton pump inhibitors and 5 ICs, significant inconsistencies in listing potential pharmacological interactions between SPCs and ICs, as well as among different ICs, were found. Similarly, the level of agreement was low in 4-set and 2-set analyses as well as when restricting the analysis to the potential DDIs identified as severe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meaning<\/strong>  In this study, large heterogeneity of ICs and SPCs in reporting information on potential DDIs with proton pump inhibitors was found, highlighting the need to create a criterion standard DDI dataset.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Abstract<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Importance<\/strong>  Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are a widely prescribed class of drugs, potentially interacting with a large number of medicines, especially among older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Beyond summary of product characteristics (SPCs), interaction checkers (ICs) are routinely used tools to help clinicians in medication review interventions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Objective<\/strong>  To assess the consistency of information on drugs potentially interacting with PPIs as reported in their SPCs and different ICs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Design, Setting, and Participants<\/strong>  This cross-sectional study was conducted using data from SPCs for 5 PPIs (omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole) and 5 ICs (ie, INTERCheck WEB, Micromedex, Lexicomp, Epocrates, and drugs.com). Information from the SPCs and the ICs were extracted between July 15 and 30, 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Main Outcomes and Measures<\/strong>  The main outcome was the level of agreement among SPCs and the 5 ICs in identifying drugs potentially interacting with PPIs and attributing drug-drug interaction (DDI) severity categories. The level of agreement was computed using Gwet AC1 statistic on the 5 ICs and by comparing 4-sets and 2-sets of ICs. As a sensitivity analysis, the level of agreement in listing PPI-related DDIs was evaluated using Cohen \u03ba and Fleiss \u03ba coefficients.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Results<\/strong>\u00a0\u00a0Considering SPCs and the 5 ICs, a total of 518 potentially interacting drugs with omeprazole were reported, 455 for esomeprazole, 433 for lansoprazole, 421 for pantoprazole, and 405 for rabeprazole. As compared with the ICs, the SPCs reported a much smaller number of drugs potentially interacting with PPIs, with proportions ranging from 2.7% (11 potentially interacting drugs) for rabeprazole to 7.6% (33 potentially interacting drugs) for lansoprazole of the total identified drugs at risk of interaction with a PPI. The overall level of agreement among the 5 ICs for identifying potential interactions was poor (from 0.23 [95% CI, 0.21-0.25] for omeprazole to 0.27 [95% CI, 0.24-0.29] for pantoprazole and 0.27 [95% CI, 0.25-0.29] for rabeprazole). Similarly, the level of agreement was low in 4-set and 2-set analyses as well as when restricting the analysis to the potential DDIs identified as severe (range, 0.30-0.32).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Conclusions and Relevance<\/strong>  This cross-sectional study found significant disagreement among different ICs and SPCs, highlighting the need to focus on standardizing DDI databases. Therefore, to ensure evaluation and prevention of clinically relevant DDIs, it is recommended to revise multiple ICs and consult with specialists, such as clinical pharmacologists, particularly for patients with complex medical conditions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Original Investigation  Pharmacy and Clinical Phar […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[32,23],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26447"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=26447"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26447\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26740,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26447\/revisions\/26740"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=26447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=26447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=26447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}