C\u00e9sar\u00a0Caraballo,\u00a0Shiwani\u00a0Mahajan,\u00a0Karthik\u00a0Murugiah,\u00a0et al<\/h3>\n\n\n\nJAMA. <\/em>2023;329(3):255-257. doi:10.1001\/jama.2022.21509<\/h3>\n\n\n\nSleep is a key element of patient care and experience, and its deprivation among hospitalized patients is an important stressor that increases their risk of adverse events during and after hospitalization.1<\/a><\/sup>-3<\/a><\/sup> Among the many sources of sleep interruption are early morning blood draws,4<\/a><\/sup>-6<\/a><\/sup> which are often performed to inform decisions during morning rounds. We describe the degree to which blood draws occurred during traditional sleep hours and investigated trends over time.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\nMethods<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
We queried electronic health records for all blood draw events for adult patients hospitalized within both campuses (York Street and Saint Raphael) of the Yale New Haven Hospital (a large teaching hospital) between November 1, 2016, and October 31, 2019. We excluded blood draws performed in the emergency department, critical care units, and step-down units and those performed during the first 24 hours after admission to avoid nonroutine blood draws obtained during the initial evaluation. There were no local policies to specifically modify blood draw timing during the study period. Patients\u2019 characteristics were obtained from the electronic health records. The institutional review board at Yale University exempted the study from review and need for patient consent.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\nWe evaluated differences in timing of blood draws across patient subgroups using the Kruskal-Wallis test and compared the proportion of samples collected between 4:00 am and 6:59 am (early morning blood draws) by the characteristics of the patients using the \u03c72<\/sup> test. In the Yale New Haven Hospital, primary clinical teams place blood draw orders specifying the exact desired timing of collection, which is set to 6:00 am as the default. We estimated the absolute difference in the percentage of early morning blood draws between November 2016 and October 2019 using a z<\/em> score. All analyses were performed on sample-level data using Stata version 17.0 (StataCorp). A 2-sided P<\/em>\u2009<\u2009.05 was considered statistically significant.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\nResults<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
There were 9\u202f271\u202f654 blood draws from 99\u202f945 hospitalized patients during the study period; 3\u202f598\u202f500 samples were excluded. The final study sample included 5\u202f676\u202f092 blood draws from 79\u202f347 patients.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\nOf the total samples, 2\u202f206\u202f410 (38.9%) were drawn between 4:00\u00a0am\u00a0and 6:59\u00a0am\u00a0(8.9% from 4:00\u00a0am\u00a0to 4:59\u00a0am, 16.5% from 5:00\u00a0am\u00a0to 5:59\u00a0am, and 13.5% from 6:00\u00a0am\u00a0to 6:59\u00a0am) (Table<\/a>). Outside the early morning time window, 20.7% of total blood draws were performed between 7:00\u00a0am\u00a0and 11:59\u00a0am, 28.2% between 12:00\u00a0pm\u00a0and 11:59\u00a0pm, and 12.2% between 12:00\u00a0am\u00a0and 3:59\u00a0am. There were modest but statistically significant differences in the distribution of early morning blood draws across age groups, race and ethnicity, and sex (Table<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"\/](\"https:\/\/cdn.jamanetwork.com\/ama\/content_public\/journal\/jama\/939070\/jld220086t1_1673466215.08801.png?Expires=1677017088&Signature=Ep71PC0CJK3~dHGcwjcXREH3lC-d5VJSyHpn1jHrRfdhOGAYR5iZKsHqOHKSywlY2XTyHIkVjn7SAvmORZvzIFaOLbGOIYQZ2jOSIpn79Awuhg4zP~6pGNuxufELHP2ceKVajJ83vYcaFnvkn71pvujgHVrHML6ofLPX-8jcjzS0rLB0vGuRJWfbJ2zMjC~hTDSZCEnkG-RJmxZ6SlZJH1YrtBqzAjbBhpTXIeb5cZDZYPG1diC1ELyD~8ksI5HQDvJBGWyy5CF6YTnb7NPi7HBnbJf5p~tyRY187A8~Kk1Ggt51lS24hwfHGED9artjOTw8bQQIqS3iCuyoD6QdDQ__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nFrom November 2016 through October 2019, the monthly proportion of blood samples drawn between 4:00 am and 6:59 am increased from 36.9% to 41.4% (change of 4.5 percentage points [95% CI, 4.1-4.9 percentage points]; P<\/em>\u2009<\u2009.001]) (Figure<\/a>). By hourly blocks, the proportion of samples drawn between 4:00 am and 4:59 am declined from 9.5% to 7.7% (change of \u22121.8 percentage points [95% CI, \u22122.1 to \u22121.6 percentage points]), the proportion drawn between 5:00 am and 5:59 am increased from 14.6% to 18.8% (change of 4.2 percentage points [95% CI, 3.9-4.5 percentage points]), and the proportion drawn between 6:00 am and 6:59 am increased from 12.8% to 14.9% (change of 2.1 percentage points [95% CI, 1.8-2.4 percentage points]) (P<\/em>\u2009<\u2009.001 for all comparisons).<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"\/](\"https:\/\/cdn.jamanetwork.com\/ama\/content_public\/journal\/jama\/939070\/jld220086f1_1673466215.10303.png?Expires=1677017088&Signature=WQglf~vC0NReZKWP3bqqQ9KIn1QR~0~jSfY~y3GYJv0AgktsgWJn~Wxckch8lu3U5vrDXNWwFfaOEZPWp1PaD-FdRl3WQC7edOEE-KOqiwug1LILYnlvewQ7fot~J6irBO2dbsNBBy2pVgI1bNh7rJGd6P~e9Jzj5TGQBxUJCqHezJMwiE3Q~uWkr6RgC7hTQP1EHL0mMdSo0hbkjs3sU-VEb7UQWYGxtuOTbFtATmHQu0-JJt-4A8uNjcS988ktgwotIqI4XnqSpPLO8nHkGP1fgYNdCYSDa4WARi~E6uD9AAvF5n4JwxEJslsN-3YQFdVmclpHO5xeKqnDXmbkzg__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nDiscussion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
In this study, the proportion of early morning blood draws was persistently high over 3 years, representing nearly 4 in 10 daily blood draws at the end of the study period. The timing distribution within early morning blood draws shifted to slightly later over the course of the study. This study, the largest on the timing of blood draws to our knowledge, suggests that early morning phlebotomies remain common among hospitalized patients despite growing evidence of the detrimental effects of sleep disruptions.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\nThe modest timing differences across patient characteristics indicates the pervasive nature of early morning phlebotomy practices. Such practices are especially relevant for elderly patients, in whom sleep interruptions may increase the risk of delirium and posthospital syndrome.1<\/a><\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\nEarly morning blood draws may be necessary to assess patients\u2019 health status during morning rounds and occasionally to inform discharge decisions, but patient-centered care should consider strategies to limit nonurgent tests during sleep hours. Studies are needed to assess if improving sleep by limiting early morning blood draws and other interruptions could improve patient outcomes without untoward effects on quality of care.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\nLimitations include that the study used data from a single teaching hospital and that urgent early morning blood draws performed on medical and surgical floors could not be excluded from the analysis.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Research Letter January 17, 2023 Timing […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[32,23],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23395"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=23395"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23395\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23396,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23395\/revisions\/23396"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=23395"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=23395"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=23395"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Sleep is a key element of patient care and experience, and its deprivation among hospitalized patients is an important stressor that increases their risk of adverse events during and after hospitalization.1<\/a><\/sup>-3<\/a><\/sup> Among the many sources of sleep interruption are early morning blood draws,4<\/a><\/sup>-6<\/a><\/sup> which are often performed to inform decisions during morning rounds. We describe the degree to which blood draws occurred during traditional sleep hours and investigated trends over time.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n We queried electronic health records for all blood draw events for adult patients hospitalized within both campuses (York Street and Saint Raphael) of the Yale New Haven Hospital (a large teaching hospital) between November 1, 2016, and October 31, 2019. We excluded blood draws performed in the emergency department, critical care units, and step-down units and those performed during the first 24 hours after admission to avoid nonroutine blood draws obtained during the initial evaluation. There were no local policies to specifically modify blood draw timing during the study period. Patients\u2019 characteristics were obtained from the electronic health records. The institutional review board at Yale University exempted the study from review and need for patient consent.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n We evaluated differences in timing of blood draws across patient subgroups using the Kruskal-Wallis test and compared the proportion of samples collected between 4:00 am and 6:59 am (early morning blood draws) by the characteristics of the patients using the \u03c72<\/sup> test. In the Yale New Haven Hospital, primary clinical teams place blood draw orders specifying the exact desired timing of collection, which is set to 6:00 am as the default. We estimated the absolute difference in the percentage of early morning blood draws between November 2016 and October 2019 using a z<\/em> score. All analyses were performed on sample-level data using Stata version 17.0 (StataCorp). A 2-sided P<\/em>\u2009<\u2009.05 was considered statistically significant.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n There were 9\u202f271\u202f654 blood draws from 99\u202f945 hospitalized patients during the study period; 3\u202f598\u202f500 samples were excluded. The final study sample included 5\u202f676\u202f092 blood draws from 79\u202f347 patients.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Of the total samples, 2\u202f206\u202f410 (38.9%) were drawn between 4:00\u00a0am\u00a0and 6:59\u00a0am\u00a0(8.9% from 4:00\u00a0am\u00a0to 4:59\u00a0am, 16.5% from 5:00\u00a0am\u00a0to 5:59\u00a0am, and 13.5% from 6:00\u00a0am\u00a0to 6:59\u00a0am) (Table<\/a>). Outside the early morning time window, 20.7% of total blood draws were performed between 7:00\u00a0am\u00a0and 11:59\u00a0am, 28.2% between 12:00\u00a0pm\u00a0and 11:59\u00a0pm, and 12.2% between 12:00\u00a0am\u00a0and 3:59\u00a0am. There were modest but statistically significant differences in the distribution of early morning blood draws across age groups, race and ethnicity, and sex (Table<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n From November 2016 through October 2019, the monthly proportion of blood samples drawn between 4:00 am and 6:59 am increased from 36.9% to 41.4% (change of 4.5 percentage points [95% CI, 4.1-4.9 percentage points]; P<\/em>\u2009<\u2009.001]) (Figure<\/a>). By hourly blocks, the proportion of samples drawn between 4:00 am and 4:59 am declined from 9.5% to 7.7% (change of \u22121.8 percentage points [95% CI, \u22122.1 to \u22121.6 percentage points]), the proportion drawn between 5:00 am and 5:59 am increased from 14.6% to 18.8% (change of 4.2 percentage points [95% CI, 3.9-4.5 percentage points]), and the proportion drawn between 6:00 am and 6:59 am increased from 12.8% to 14.9% (change of 2.1 percentage points [95% CI, 1.8-2.4 percentage points]) (P<\/em>\u2009<\u2009.001 for all comparisons).<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n In this study, the proportion of early morning blood draws was persistently high over 3 years, representing nearly 4 in 10 daily blood draws at the end of the study period. The timing distribution within early morning blood draws shifted to slightly later over the course of the study. This study, the largest on the timing of blood draws to our knowledge, suggests that early morning phlebotomies remain common among hospitalized patients despite growing evidence of the detrimental effects of sleep disruptions.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n The modest timing differences across patient characteristics indicates the pervasive nature of early morning phlebotomy practices. Such practices are especially relevant for elderly patients, in whom sleep interruptions may increase the risk of delirium and posthospital syndrome.1<\/a><\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Early morning blood draws may be necessary to assess patients\u2019 health status during morning rounds and occasionally to inform discharge decisions, but patient-centered care should consider strategies to limit nonurgent tests during sleep hours. Studies are needed to assess if improving sleep by limiting early morning blood draws and other interruptions could improve patient outcomes without untoward effects on quality of care.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Limitations include that the study used data from a single teaching hospital and that urgent early morning blood draws performed on medical and surgical floors could not be excluded from the analysis.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Research Letter January 17, 2023 Timing […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[32,23],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23395"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=23395"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23395\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23396,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23395\/revisions\/23396"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=23395"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=23395"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=23395"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Methods<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Results<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\nDiscussion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n