{"id":20337,"date":"2021-06-14T04:08:00","date_gmt":"2021-06-13T20:08:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/?p=20337"},"modified":"2021-06-15T05:58:58","modified_gmt":"2021-06-14T21:58:58","slug":"20337","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/?p=20337","title":{"rendered":"[Lancet\u53d1\u8868\u8bba\u6587]\uff1a\u4f34\u968fD-\u4e8c\u805a\u4f53\u5347\u9ad8\u7684\u65b0\u51a0\u80ba\u708e\u4f4f\u9662\u60a3\u8005\u4f7f\u7528\u6cbb\u7597\u6027\u6216\u9884\u9632\u6027\u6297\u51dd"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>ARTICLES|<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thelancet.com\/journals\/lancet\/issue\/vol397no10291\/PIIS0140-6736(21)X0024-4\">&nbsp;VOLUME 397, ISSUE 10291<\/a>,&nbsp;P2253-2263,&nbsp;JUNE 12, 2021<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Therapeutic versus prophylactic anticoagulation for patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 and elevated D-dimer concentration (ACTION): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Renato D Lopes, Pedro Gabriel Melo de Barros e Silva, Remo H M Furtado,&nbsp;et al<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Lancet 2021; 397: 2253-2263<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">DOI:<a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(21)01203-4\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(21)01203-4<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"seccestitle10\">Summary<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Background<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>COVID-19 is associated with a prothrombotic state leading to adverse clinical outcomes. Whether therapeutic anticoagulation improves outcomes in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 is unknown. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of therapeutic versus prophylactic anticoagulation in this population.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Methods<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>We did a pragmatic, open-label (with blinded adjudication), multicentre, randomised, controlled trial, at 31 sites in Brazil. Patients (aged \u226518 years) hospitalised with COVID-19 and elevated D-dimer concentration, and who had COVID-19 symptoms for up to 14 days before randomisation, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either therapeutic or prophylactic anticoagulation. Therapeutic anticoagulation was in-hospital oral rivaroxaban (20 mg or 15 mg daily) for stable patients, or initial subcutaneous enoxaparin (1 mg\/kg twice per day) or intravenous unfractionated heparin (to achieve a 0\u00b73\u20130\u00b77 IU\/mL anti-Xa concentration) for clinically unstable patients, followed by rivaroxaban to day 30. Prophylactic anticoagulation was standard in-hospital enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. The primary efficacy outcome was a hierarchical analysis of time to death, duration of hospitalisation, or duration of supplemental oxygen to day 30, analysed with the win ratio method (a ratio &gt;1 reflects a better outcome in the therapeutic anticoagulation group) in the intention-to-treat population. The primary safety outcome was major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding through 30 days. This study is registered with&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ClinicalTrials.gov<\/a>&nbsp;(<a href=\"http:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/show\/NCT04394377\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">NCT04394377<\/a>) and is completed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Findings<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>From June 24, 2020, to Feb 26, 2021, 3331 patients were screened and 615 were randomly allocated (311 [50%] to the therapeutic anticoagulation group and 304 [50%] to the prophylactic anticoagulation group). 576 (94%) were clinically stable and 39 (6%) clinically unstable. One patient, in the therapeutic group, was lost to follow-up because of withdrawal of consent and was not included in the primary analysis. The primary efficacy outcome was not different between patients assigned therapeutic or prophylactic anticoagulation, with 28\u2008899 (34\u00b78%) wins in the therapeutic group and 34\u2008288 (41\u00b73%) in the prophylactic group (win ratio 0\u00b786 [95% CI 0\u00b759\u20131\u00b722], p=0\u00b740). Consistent results were seen in clinically stable and clinically unstable patients. The primary safety outcome of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred in 26 (8%) patients assigned therapeutic anticoagulation and seven (2%) assigned prophylactic anticoagulation (relative risk 3\u00b764 [95% CI 1\u00b761\u20138\u00b727], p=0\u00b70010). Allergic reaction to the study medication occurred in two (1%) patients in the therapeutic anticoagulation group and three (1%) in the prophylactic anticoagulation group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/els-jbs-prod-cdn.jbs.elsevierhealth.com\/cms\/attachment\/748b8b6d-ae48-4300-a048-e6271ab55c80\/gr1.gif\" alt=\"\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/els-jbs-prod-cdn.jbs.elsevierhealth.com\/cms\/attachment\/effdc42f-6009-46a9-a036-ca31c4ddae2a\/gr2.jpg\" alt=\"\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/els-jbs-prod-cdn.jbs.elsevierhealth.com\/cms\/attachment\/e9f32c33-3f92-4948-9d2d-18ff2fff2db2\/gr3.gif\" alt=\"\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Interpretation<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>In patients hospitalised with COVID-19 and elevated D-dimer concentration, in-hospital therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban or enoxaparin followed by rivaroxaban to day 30 did not improve clinical outcomes and increased bleeding compared with prophylactic anticoagulation. Therefore, use of therapeutic-dose rivaroxaban, and other direct oral anticoagulants, should be avoided in these patients in the absence of an evidence-based indication for oral anticoagulation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Funding<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Coalition COVID-19 Brazil, Bayer SA<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ARTICLES|&nbsp;VOLUME 397, ISSUE 10291,&nbsp;P2253-2263 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[32,23],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20337"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=20337"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20337\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20339,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20337\/revisions\/20339"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=20337"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=20337"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csccm.org.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=20337"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}