现在的位置: 首页时讯速递, 进展交流>正文
[JAMA发表文章]:急诊科集束化治疗对老年急性心衰患者30天出院率及存活率的影响
2020年12月09日 时讯速递, 进展交流 暂无评论

Original Investigation November 17, 2020

Effect of an Emergency Department Care Bundle on 30-Day Hospital Discharge and Survival Among Elderly Patients With Acute Heart Failure: The ELISABETH Randomized Clinical Trial

Yonathan Freund, Marine Cachanado, Quentin Delannoy, et al

JAMA. 2020;324(19):1948-1956. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.19378

Abstract

Importance

Clinical guidelines for the early management of acute heart failure in the emergency department (ED) setting are based on only moderate levels of evidence, with subsequent low adherence to these guidelines.

Objective

To test the effect of an early guideline-recommended care bundle on short-term prognosis in older patients with acute heart failure in the ED.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial in 15 EDs in France of 503 patients 75 years and older with a diagnosis of acute heart failure in the ED from December 2018 to September 2019 and followed up for 30 days until October 2019.

Interventions

A care bundle that included early intravenous nitrate boluses; management of precipitating factors, such as acute coronary syndrome, infection, or atrial fibrillation; and moderate dose of intravenous diuretics (n = 200). In the control group, patient care was left to the discretion of the treating emergency physician (n = 303). Each center was randomized to the order in which they switched to the “intervention period.” After the initial 4-week control period for all centers, 1 center entered in the intervention period every 2 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the number of days alive and out of hospital at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality, 30-day cardiovascular mortality, unscheduled readmission, length of hospital stay, and kidney impairment.

Results

Among 503 patients who were randomized (median age, 87 years; 298 [59%] women), 502 were analyzed. In the intervention group, patients received a median (interquartile range) of 27.0 (9-54) mg of intravenous nitrates in the first 4 hours vs 4.0 (2.0-6.0) mg in the control group (adjusted difference, 23.8 [95% CI, 13.5-34.1]). There was a significantly higher percentage of patients in the intervention group treated for their precipitating factors than in the control group (58.8% vs 31.9%; adjusted difference, 31.1% [95% CI, 14.3%-47.9%]). There was no statistically significant difference in the primary end point of the number of days alive and out of hospital at 30 days (median [interquartile range], 19 [0- 24] d in both groups; adjusted difference, −1.9 [95% CI, −6.6 to 2.8]; adjusted ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.64-1.21]). At 30 days, there was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in mortality (8.0% vs 9.7%; adjusted difference, 4.1% [95% CI, −17.2% to 25.3%]), cardiovascular mortality (5.0% vs 7.4%; adjusted difference, 2.1% [95% CI, −15.5% to 19.8%]), unscheduled readmission (14.3% vs 15.7%; adjusted difference, −1.3% [95% CI, −26.3% to 23.7%]), median length of hospital stay (8 d in both groups; adjusted difference, 2.5 [95% CI, −0.9 to 5.8]), and kidney impairment (1% in both groups).

Conclusions and Relevance

Among older patients with acute heart failure, use of a guideline-based comprehensive care bundle in the ED compared with usual care did not result in a statistically significant difference in the number of days alive and out of the hospital at 30 days. Further research is needed to identify effective treatments for acute heart failure in older patients.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03683212

给我留言

您必须 [ 登录 ] 才能发表留言!

×
腾讯微博